A Video – Humboldt County Bankruptcy Lawyer Alternative $44

December 24th, 2011 Filed under: Online Bankruptcy — Bankruptcy Author

Here’s a nice video I was watching. Posted it here for my readers.




Author’s Description:

A Humboldt County Bankruptcy Lawyer cannot prepare a better bankruptcy than you can using bankruptcy software from In fact, if you hire a bankruptcy attorney from Arcata, Fortuna, Eureka, Ferndale, Trinidad or anywhere else in Humboldt County, that bankruptcy lawyer will actually have you prepare your bankruptcy filing using software very similar to ours–and charge you about $1300 more! Using our software, you must physically file your paperwork at the Santa Rosa bankruptcy court, which is a bit of a drive, but that ONE trip will save you a lot — other than your filing, you will have to make a trip to the bankruptcy court again whether you hire a Humboldt County Bankruptcy Attorney or Online bankruptcy filing is a big We provide a “Bankruptcy Without a Lawyer” tutorial on our website to ease the Please find out what sort of Chapter 7 or 13 bankruptcy filing options you have by visiting our


Howto

Tagged with: bankruptcy attorney, arcata, fortuna, eureka, ferndale, trinidad, bankruptcy software, online bankruptcy filing, chapter 7, chapter 13, ezbankruptcy, Forms



This video has had 21 views and is 158 seconds in length


Honest Review – The World As It Is: Dispatches on the Myth of Human Progress

October 30th, 2011 Filed under: Bankruptcy Service — Bankruptcy Author

The Lowest Price we could find is $26.99 $7.69

Drawing on two decades of experience as a war correspondent and based on his numerous columns for Truthdig, Chris Hedges presents The World As It Is, a panorama of the American empire at home and abroad, from the coarsening effect of America’s War on Terror to the front lines in the Middle East and South Asia and the continuing Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Underlying his reportage is a constant struggle with the nature of war and its impact on human civilization. “War is always about betrayal,” Hedges notes. “It is about betrayal of the young by the old, of cynics by idealists, and of soldiers and Marines by politicians. Society’s institutions, including our religious institutions, which mold us into compliant citizens, are unmasked.”


Review:

I have not the slightest idea why people would bother to purchase this book when just going to truthdig.com would afford them the opportunity to read all of what Hedge’s wrote. It’s like why even bother to publish a collection of essays (and lay to waste more trees!), other than the obvious reason that Hedges needs to find some means of paying his son’s Colgate tuition bill (which I’m sure is upwards of $40K/year)…? All that Hedges has to rant and rail about can be heard on Democracy Now or in the music of David Rovics (free of charge, however) so his readership consists mostly of people who something of a schadenfreude, i.e. they actually enjoy reading about how messed up the world is and need/want to be told that it’s only going to get worse. I used to have immense respect for Hedges; over the past decade he has degenerated from a courageous war reporter to something of a misanthropic Naderite on homeopathic steroids picking a bone with anyone who does not see eye to eye with him and grinding his axe in self-righteous and self-serving futility.

Every year, he publishes some form of screed that proclaims pretty much the same thing(s):the earth is going to hell in a handbasket (and the more dire situation is, the more people become indifferent to it); the rich are getting richer and richer; corporations have ever more power, and we are incapable of any form of moral evolution (we are, however, according to Hedges, somehow magically capable of evolving into a Marxist society devoid of any and all of the miasmas of modernity – this despite every historical precedent suggesting otherwise). For all Hedges’ insight (that I once admired), his analyses are as predictable as they are obnoxiously self-ingratiating and ultimately, shallow. It wouldn’t take much brainpower to predict what Hedges would say in his 2012 book. It will be salted with (mostly out-of context) Hannah Arendt quotations, ‘little Eichmann’ references and some invocation of Nietzsche about how “we have become the evil we so deplore.” (Exactly who this ‘we’ is Hedges never endeavours to explain – just about everyone who bothers to read and take his essays seriously at this point presumably agrees with him fully already, so it is unclear how he can think he is doing anything besides preaching to the proverbial choir.) Hedges will go to point out (correctly) that progressives who (still) support Obama are either oxymorons are just plain morons. In the end it will just clamour about how we have lost our capacity for (insert any one of the following) empathy/love/forgiveness/patience/ability to see interconnectedness, etc. etc.

This type of analysis is not just a waste of intellectual energy and natural resources, it is an exercise in outright futility. Just what is Hedges hoping to accomplish in his writing? “We are breeding ourselves to death.” Is this a joke? If so, it’s on you, Chris – people who have four children (two of whom were born after you turned 50!) do not have the right to say that they are concerned with overpopulation. Of course, the converse of that claim (to stop breeding altogether (a solution I myself advocate and actually practice) leads to the same result – the extinction of the human race (which, you cannot seriously think would be a bad thing). “Man is a cruel animal.” Well, true enough. But so are hippos (who have been known to kill their own young); so are most cat species, who will kill any animal smaller than them that moves; so are the insect species in which the female consumes the male after copulation; so are our relatives, the chimps, whom Jane Goodall was shocked to learn engage in what only be described as animalistic warfare. Additionally, not to put to fine a point on it, but this claim makes the case against breeding a fortiori. Finally, isn’t this (neo)Hobbesian insight what corporate world has been arguing for years – that because of our inclinations to savagery we cannot be expected to exhibit empathy and compassion? Does Hedges really think that he will bring about a more just, compassionate and caring world through writing all that he’s written?

I, for one, am not fooled (much less enticed) by the anti-brand, anti-elitist stance of someone who is the product of Loomis-Chaffee, Colgate, and Harvard Divinity. Hedges is just as much of a fence-sitting coward as the liberal fops he so deplores. For all his radical posturing and superficially Marxist leanings, he is nothing more than an uptight, whiny, bourgeois idealist who still believes that love, peace, and egalitarianism will reign in the new world once modern industrial society collapses (which, inevitably, it will). Until then, he’s not willing to do anything about it except write books, travel around the country, crank out more children and lecture/denounce us sots for not being willing and able to dedicate and/or lay down our lives in the name of some higher cause. I think it would have been better for him to remain a war reporter.

A Review for – Adapt: Why Success Always Starts with Failure

October 28th, 2011 Filed under: Bankruptcy Service — Bankruptcy Author

The Lowest Price we could find is $27.00 $12.68

In this groundbreaking book, Tim Harford, the Undercover Economist, shows us a new and inspiring approach to solving the most pressing problems in our lives. When faced withcomplex situations, we have all become accustomed to looking to our leaders to set out a plan of action and blaze a path to success. Harford argues that todays challenges simply cannot be tackled with ready-made solutions and expert opinion; the world has become far too unpredictable and profoundly complex. Instead, we must adapt.

Deftly weaving together psychology, evolutionary biology, anthropology, physics, and economics, along with the compelling story of hard-won lessons learned in the field, Harford makes a passionate case for the importance of adaptive trial and error in tackling issues such as climate change, poverty, and financial crisesas well as in fostering innovation and creativity in our business and personal lives.

Taking us from corporate boardrooms to the deserts of Iraq, Adapt clearly explains the necessary ingredients for turning failure into success. It is a breakthrough handbook for survivingand prospering in our complex and ever-shifting world.


Review:

As always, Tim Harford finds the most interesting economic research and explains it well. As I read Adapt, I was frequently inspired to go online and look up the economics he reports on. The section on evolved virtual creatures prompted me to visit YouTube and watch for myself how animal-like forms evolved through computer simulations. After reading about the unintended consequences of some foreign aid programs, I had to see what a Play Pump looks like and watch the interviews with teachers who preferred the old borehole pumps. Adapt is an excellent collection of quotes, stories, and research findings on innovation and economic evolution.

However, the book falls short in a few ways. First, although Harford’s writing is generally clear, he employs some annoying rhetorical devices that should have been edited out. One is that he repeatedly withholds the name of the person whose work he’s discussing until he has built up all the details of the story. Only once he’s laid out the research results does he reveal that the anonymous manager is a famous figure or someone we met in the last chapter. It’s as if Harford isn’t confident that the research will hold anyone’s attention, so he has to play games with the reader. Equally irksome is his tendency to repeat points again and again, reminding readers of things he mentioned two pages back that no one could have forgotten.

The chapter on the financial crisis was also a disappointment. It devolved into boring jargon and obscure terms for different loans and contracts. Maybe it’s not possible to make subprime mortgages entertaining, and I don’t know if any other writer could have done a better job. But the book would have been more enjoyable without that tedious interlude.

But the main drawback is that Harford’s thesis that economic progress parallels evolution in the natural world is not fully developed or defended. Certainly, economic progress is like evolution in that bad products disappear and good technology, like good genes, is passed along. Harford’s assertion that isolation is a necessary precondition of creativity seems less persuasive. He gives examples from evolutionary biology in which populations adapted differently because they were separated by physical barriers. Harford then offers the example of researchers who moved out to Utah or Arizona to get some space as proof that human innovators must be similarly isolated. But is that really true in the world of human ideas? I’m not convinced. Virtually all innovators of the last century had some kind of intellectual peer group, either through a university or social circle. And modern communications enable researchers in Utah to keep abreast of the latest ideas and theories. They’re not separated intellectually from their peers the way guppies in different ponds are separated physically. Furthermore, Harford does not fully explain what process in the economy corresponds to sexual reproduction in the natural world. How do good ideas spread if they’re not identified by a manager from the top? Harford alludes to imitation by other economic actors, but doesn’t show how or why this occurs.

Adapt is worthwhile reading as a starting-point for investigating economic research on innovation, but its model of economic development as a corollary to biological evolution is not completely satisfactory.